Showing posts with label csus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label csus. Show all posts

Sunday, May 01, 2016

Noh Masks, at California State University, Sacramento University Library Gallery

The California State University, Sacramento University Library Gallery currently features an exhibit, "Traditions Transfigured Noh Masks of Bidou Yamaguchi", February 11, 2016 - May 21, 2016.

http://www.al.csus.edu/sota/ulg/

"The human face and its expressive potential have inspired artists around the world for millennia. Arguably, Japan’s Noh theater provides an unparalleled domain for exploring emotion and representing the human countenance. Today, Noh continues to inspire a dynamic dialogue between artists from Asia and the west. Expanding on this rich vein, Traditions Transfigured features contemporary works by Bidou Yamaguchi (b. 1970, Fukuoka, Japan). These masks apply the forms, techniques, transformative spirit, and mysterious elegance of Noh masks to iconic female portraits from the European art historical canon, and to Kabuki actor prints by Sharaku, Japan’s enigmatic 18th century portrait master. 
Like a human face, the work of Bidou Yamaguchi opens itself to many angles of interpretation. The product of a Noh mask carver who also creates modern sculpture in the form of masks, Bidou’s art speaks to issues such as cultural identity, gender, portraiture, performance, representation, and appropriation, as well as the roles of beauty and craft in contemporary art. 
Our fundamental premise is that Bidou’s art is informed by the world of Noh, and, in turn, offers insight into this diversely creative realm of theater and image making. We stress the productive links between Bidou’s roles as a “traditional” artisan who works to reproduce old masks and a contemporary artist who makes new objects. We treat these fresh creations as “masks,” although they were not commissioned for use in Noh plays. In fact, the oblique orientation of the eyes in most of these portraits differentiates them from Noh masks. Despite these differences, our approach imagines these works as potential characters in future dramas. 
In the world of Noh, Bidou’s work challenges the conventions of Noh masks and, by extension, might stimulate new types of Noh plays. More expansively, Bidou’s art suggests ways of deploying the aesthetic strategies and ontological assumptions of Noh. This is not simply another strategy for “modernizing within tradition” in Japan, or a new manifestation of Japanese cultural uniqueness with universal application. Bidou’s work is not aimed at any totalizing theory about contemporary art practice, and certainly the artist has produced no manifesto to such an end. 
Instead, his art seems focused on a particular task. Bidou’s masks are a kind of intercession on behalf of half-human, half-artistic spirits. His works are transfigurations that bring about reincarnations into a transformed body (keshin) that is the true body (hontai) for figures like Lisa Gherardini who have become so well known as images (the Mona Lisa) that they all but cease to exist as humans. This act is analogous to the procedure of intercession or recuperation in the texts of Noh plays. However, unlike Noh plays, where this literary rebirth recuperates the socially unacceptable acts and desires of women and other marginalized figures, Bidou gives a new body—literally, a face with the potential of speaking—to persons who have been turned into “ghosts” by mechanical reproduction, popular appropriation, and, perhaps, a deeper unwillingness to comprehend the humanity of people removed from us in time and place. 
Bidou’s art constructs a three-dimensional face for these rhetorical ghosts, and thus brings about an altered understanding of these persons who have become so familiar as images they are almost invisible as the vestiges of souls. Although his art is rooted in a Buddhist worldview, it resonates with the Christian idea of transfiguration as a change in form or appearance that parallels a spiritual change, and it signals the exultant moment when the human meets the divine so that the temporal becomes the eternal. 
By transfiguring both European and Japanese artistic traditions, Bidou Yamaguchi’s work merges past and present. More importantly, it allows contemporary audiences to uncover deeper dimensions of their own humanity. By imagining ourselves wearing different faces, we can forge deeper spiritual connections with each other. 
Kendall H. Brown, PhD
Guest Curator

Saturday, January 08, 2011

Class Schedule Spring 2011

Coming up for air and looking at local class schedules for Spring 2011.

Looks like a repeat of Fall 2010.

CSUS Spring 2011 Class Availability

  1. CSC 132 - Computing Theory (3 Units)

    • TR 4:00-5:15 p.m.; Meiliu Lu; 0/30 seats available

  2. CSC 139 - Operating System Principles (3 Units)

    • TR 3:00-4:15 p.m.; Du Zhang; 0/30 seats available

  3. STAT 50 - Intro Probability+Stat (4 Units)

    • MWF 10:00-10:50 a.m.; T 10:30-11:20 a.m.; Coskun Cetin; 0/30 seats available

    • MWF 1:00-1:50 p.m.; T 1:30-2:20 p.m.; Coskun Cetin; 1/30 seats available
CSUS Open University cost per credit for Spring 2011 is $221/unit. So, either $663 or $884, for one semester-length class.

UC-Davis offers a similar program, called Open Campus. They charge $250/unit, so maybe $750 or $1,000 for one quarter-length class.

What About Matriculating As A Conditionally Classified Graduate Student?
  • Costs rise 317% for one Spring 2011 three-credit class: $2,102 for 1-6 units. For 6.1+ units, it costs $3,251. CSUS requires 30 units to graduate, so, if working full time and taking two classes each semester: ($2,102 / 6) = $350 * 30 = $10,500

  • Matriculation for Spring 2011 occurred last Fall; matriculation for Fall 2011 remains open until March 1, 2011.
What About Taking The Classes At UC-Davis And Transferring Them to CSUS?
What About Graduate School At UC-Davis Instead?
  • ...
What About Graduate School Via Accredited Online School?
  • Possibly...

Monday, August 30, 2010

"I Would Like To Switch To Door Number Two, CSUS"

Signs of the times, I guess, of the state of higher education in California.

Due to ongoing class reductions, the CSUS computer science department has chosen to offer only one section of CSC 132, "Computing Theory". As an Open University student, I attended today's first class session anyway, with hopes of accommodation, buoyed somewhat by the CSUS class scheduler's modification of the class status from "Waitlist" to "Open".

I found the class full to standing room only. After class, the instructor rebuffed my request for consideration. First consideration goes to waitlisted, matriculated graduate students; second consideration goes to waitlisted, undergraduate students. Anything left goes to Open University students. I asked whether the class was consistently this full each semester, to which the instructor replied the department had declined to open a second section. She volunteered if I was a matriculated graduate or undergraduate student, I could get onto the list. I thanked her (sincerely) and left.

It is a tough choice, but fair.

Tomorrow, my second choice: CSC 139, "Operating System Principles".

I need CSC 132 as well as STAT 50 to complete the prerequisites for entering the CSUS graduate school program. Seeing as all three STAT 50 sections and the one CSC 132 section were full this semester, I am feeling some concern right now for Spring 2011.

UPDATE: Which means, back to Riverside 1002, heh. I have had nearly every class in that room.

Saturday, December 19, 2009

CSUS CSC 130 Final Exam Grades

The final exam grades from my class this semester are in; it was yet another bloodbath:
  • Class peers' overall final exam average: 67.32%

  • Class peers' overall semester average: 61.35%
Maximum possible points were 100. The test counts for 30% of the final grade. No grade distribution breakdown is available for the final. However, since the final exam average is roughly consistent with the second midterm average, the distributions are likely consistent with the second midterm.

I earned a 98 on the final exam. o_O;;;; Overall, I earned 96.23% of the points available this semester, a solid A! :D

As I mentioned after taking the second midterm:
This comment on SacRate.com, however, may provide hope for even these students: "Has a huge curve. I had 47% before the final, got 66/100 and ended up with a B+ after the curve."

Food for thought. :X

Monday, November 16, 2009

CSUS CSC 130 Second Midterm Exam Grades

The second midterm grades from my class this semester are in; it was another bloodbath:

Section One Section Two
90+
1
2
80-89 3 5
70-79 7 4
60-69 7 7
50-59 6 4
49- 6 4
Average 61.90 65.85
Standard Deviation 16.29 20.11

Maximum possible points were 100. Out of 56 test takers: 3 earned an A (5%); 8 earned a B (14%); 11 earned a C (20%); 14 earned a D (25%); and 20 earned an F (36%). The test counts for 15% of the final grade.

I earned a 96 on this one. o_O;;;

One might compare this with the first midterm exam and find three signs of improvement: (1) failures dropped from 58% to 36%; (2) passing scores (C and up) increased from 22% to 39%; and (3) above average scores (B and up) increased from 11% to 19%.

On the negative side, 61% (3 in 5) earned a D or worse (compared to 79% from the first midterm). Three in five students have been left behind and are unlikely to catch up and "get" this material. :(

The increasing standard deviations between the two tests confirm a greater spread away from the average.

This comment on SacRate.com, however, may provide hope for even these students: "Has a huge curve. I had 47% before the final, got 66/100 and ended up with a B+ after the curve."

Food for thought. :X

Sunday, October 18, 2009

CSUS CSC 130 First Midterm Exam Grades

The first midterm grades from my class this semester are in; it was a bloodbath:

Section One Section Two
80+ 3 3
70-79 3 3
60-69 7 5
50-59 11 9
49- 7 6
Average 58.81 59.62
Standard Deviation 12.84 15.48

Maximum possible points were 100. Out of 57 test takers: 6 earned better than a B (11%); 6 earned a C (11%); 12 earned a D (21%); and 33 earned an F (58%). The test counts for 15% of the final grade.

To repeat: 60% failed using a scale of 90+ = A, 80-90 = B, and so forth.

Blog Archive